<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Email Renovated: Google Wave</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jarofjuice.com/2009/05/email-renovated-google-wave/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jarofjuice.com/2009/05/email-renovated-google-wave/</link>
	<description>a blog by Kinan Jarjous</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:37:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hamza</title>
		<link>http://blog.jarofjuice.com/2009/05/email-renovated-google-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-6758</link>
		<dc:creator>hamza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 12:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jarofjuice.com/?p=1504#comment-6758</guid>
		<description>are you serious...you want me to watch 1 hour and 20 minutes of this youtube video?

why don&#039;t you summarize it for us? 

oh wait you just did. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are you serious&#8230;you want me to watch 1 hour and 20 minutes of this youtube video?</p>
<p>why don&#8217;t you summarize it for us? </p>
<p>oh wait you just did. <img src='http://blog.jarofjuice.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJ</title>
		<link>http://blog.jarofjuice.com/2009/05/email-renovated-google-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-6756</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jarofjuice.com/?p=1504#comment-6756</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;za3tar -&lt;/b&gt;
Your researcher is kicking himself in the shin right now! Yeah it&#039;s more than just an email client, though it&#039;s cool to have things bundled now.

&lt;b&gt;Qwaider -&lt;/b&gt;
You&#039;re more in the know how! It looks pretty nifty though. I didn&#039;t mention it&#039;s a competitor to TB, it&#039;s simply taking things to a next level. Plus people hardly shift between two clients, let alone shift to a client that does more than you probably would want it to do! I will leave the less spam to as your job :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>za3tar -</b><br />
Your researcher is kicking himself in the shin right now! Yeah it&#8217;s more than just an email client, though it&#8217;s cool to have things bundled now.</p>
<p><b>Qwaider -</b><br />
You&#8217;re more in the know how! It looks pretty nifty though. I didn&#8217;t mention it&#8217;s a competitor to TB, it&#8217;s simply taking things to a next level. Plus people hardly shift between two clients, let alone shift to a client that does more than you probably would want it to do! I will leave the less spam to as your job <img src='http://blog.jarofjuice.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qwaider</title>
		<link>http://blog.jarofjuice.com/2009/05/email-renovated-google-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-6755</link>
		<dc:creator>Qwaider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jarofjuice.com/?p=1504#comment-6755</guid>
		<description>Nothing &quot;amazing&quot; here or &quot;new&quot; other than drag and drop into the browser. A neat trick that will catch up I am sure
This is the way Google is trying to &quot;fix&quot; what is wrong with Talk, since it really sucks
This is not really a competitor with thunderbird. They do two distinct things
Anyway... There is hardly anything in &quot;Email&quot; that would impress me other than ... well, maybe, less spam :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing &#8220;amazing&#8221; here or &#8220;new&#8221; other than drag and drop into the browser. A neat trick that will catch up I am sure<br />
This is the way Google is trying to &#8220;fix&#8221; what is wrong with Talk, since it really sucks<br />
This is not really a competitor with thunderbird. They do two distinct things<br />
Anyway&#8230; There is hardly anything in &#8220;Email&#8221; that would impress me other than &#8230; well, maybe, less spam <img src='http://blog.jarofjuice.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: za3tar</title>
		<link>http://blog.jarofjuice.com/2009/05/email-renovated-google-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-6754</link>
		<dc:creator>za3tar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 10:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jarofjuice.com/?p=1504#comment-6754</guid>
		<description>This indeed sounds interesting. However I wouldn&#039;t describe it as an &quot;email service&quot; or an &quot;email client&quot; ... I think of it as a general live collaboration tool as you illustrated .. with email being just one aspect of it.

By the way, what is ironic is that a researcher in my university has came up with a similar technology that works everywhere, not just the web, and without the need for a acentralized service like Google ... yet he was unable to market it because people thought it would not be useful ... Ahh i can only imagine the look on his face now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This indeed sounds interesting. However I wouldn&#8217;t describe it as an &#8220;email service&#8221; or an &#8220;email client&#8221; &#8230; I think of it as a general live collaboration tool as you illustrated .. with email being just one aspect of it.</p>
<p>By the way, what is ironic is that a researcher in my university has came up with a similar technology that works everywhere, not just the web, and without the need for a acentralized service like Google &#8230; yet he was unable to market it because people thought it would not be useful &#8230; Ahh i can only imagine the look on his face now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
