Recent photos on my photo blog


25 March 2009 ~ View Comments

Dear Schools: ENOUGH Bullshit!

It makes me sad to see the wasted amount of potential leaders, scientists, braniacs and people with inhuman levels intelligence.

Like Qwaider mentioned, schools have mostly become a social status – how much your family can really afford. We have grown a mentality where when someone says “I graduated from Oxford” is perceived as a God and one who says “I graduated from Damascus University” would probably be annihalated on the spot.

Lots of institutions, I am sure, do not offer an education up to par with the price tag. Here in Dubai there was a haitus over a recent (and, as usual, unexplained) price hike in one of the schools. The government eventually had to jump in and regulate price hikes the schools can get depending on their perfomance as a school – which seems fair but the means of measure might probably be flawed.

There were many truly dumb idiots in my university, and I don’t mean only academically (not smart vs intelligent) but the only reason they were on campus is because their families could afford it and they happened to pass the TOEFL test, on the third time. “Non profit organizations” feed on people with big wallets who are willing to pay anything for social recognition.

If that seems appalling, take a look at this story. This girl was thrown out of class because her mother did not have enough money to pay the fees because she is unemployed (the semester is almost over). The humiliation! To be denied education when you had nothing to do with it. I am appalled beyond measure, among with the hundred of people writing Gulf News an email right now or have commented.

In my job I got to see many people arriving, as we called them, “a package”. You get to hire someone with all sorts of three and four letter acronym certificates, but give them a task and they’d do everything written on the “Do NOT do the following” list at the end of every chapter given in the book.

So, what’s up?

Some people buy their certificates (fraud), some people buy it in the sense of paying for the education and not learning. Others pay loads of money on false promises – regardless of potential. And then you get the group of people who cannot afford education but have so much potential if given the chance. The idea of “poor people are dumb” stems from the fact that they were never given the opportunity to be educated at any age.

There’s a huge debate on whether education should be free, and whether it becomes socialism if it is, or if the quality is rendered abysmal when the government pays for it.

This is not what I am talking about here.

I am talking about the opportunity to educate people, and to have a better responsibility of selecting candidates to enroll based on their potential and wit rather than wallets. There is a social responsibility towards the community and towards education. I understand the schools have operating costs and wages to everyone working there, but come on. Throwing a girl out of class for 500 dollars? “If we allow one we should allow all” – I understand, but throwing the girl out in the middle of her class, in front of everyone, isn’t the way to solve this issue.

I would really love to see a private university or college or school dedicate a class that’s free for all, general education. If every school in the country does that, imagine how many kids would learn something new every term. Granted, they might not end up as “intelligent” as those who are paying and are getting a full education, but in the long run the average level of knowledge in the population will go up.

Or am I too utopic?




  • I totally agree with you. You need to give a person enough education before you can judge him. Best example is when you see a huge population of African immigrants in UK who are willing to seek asylum to get a better life and better education.

    As for the poor girl, I feel sorry for her parents who were suffering to try to do their best for the education of their kids, but only few ppl appreciate. I am glad that it went to the media and that there were some readers who felt for the girl and were actually willing to contribute for her education.

    You know what? next time I'll give you such donation money since I'll appoint you as my trustee. and this time, you will not use the management fees to cut your hair. lol
  • jarofjuice
    Nizar -
    Thanks for your input :)

    You're correct when you said everyone will share the same quality of education. In this light lots of bloggers and articles I had read mention this is akin to communism or socialism. Regarding the competition, it will be present within the student body since they would be striving to be better than the next, business as usual. However when it comes to schools I think that, given the material is the same as well as the price, there won't be an incentive for teachers to perform better, unless there is some funding provided for research like Za3tar proposed.

    Usually universities do have shcolarship programs, at least the ones I have seen here. But this is not the case with schools. Students with stellar performance are not distinguished from the rest when it comes to the fees. If there was a difference in fees, then it might be an incentive to push students harder to work, although there are many negative side effects such as associating the student's worth with money as well as parental pressure.

    I am not criticizing universities with a great history. I would be tatooing myself lol! What I am criticizing is the RIGHT given for people to learn. Since, like you said, not everyone in the posh university is intelligent or will contribute, the university or school can offer a course free of charge to the public, on general sciences. From this class the instructor will be able to see that person X or Y is intelligent and up to it but may not be able financially to study in this institute, which is where the grants you proposed come into play
  • Of course one has to be proud of graduating from a university that has helped many of the worlds greatest scientist that have helped build our societies to the modern point they are at today graduate.

    There is no reason to ruin or criticize the reputation of a great and successful university, they have worked hard for this status and they deserve it.

    However, just because one has graduated from oxford doesn't necessarily mean he is better than a graduate from Hong Kong's university, it just means that he was received a similar level of ''university'' education to what many of the modern worlds greatest scientist, it is in no way a guaranty that he will be a man of similar positive effect on the world to that of Einstein.

    What he does after he graduates is up to him.

    If I graduate from oxford I would tattoo the history of the university on my arm.
  • The way I see it is that this is an economic question, centrally planned vs. free market.

    Should we allow schools and universities to be privatized? or should they be public owned? or should we have a mixture of both?

    If we make all schools public owned and funded, everybody shares a right of a similar quality and level of education, in this case competition would be restricted and limited to some extent due to financial reasons.

    High levels and qualities of education come at a high cost, which wouldn't be possible in this case because all costs are shared equally, so should we punish the successful universities?

    In the other case we will end up with a situation similar to that that you have mentioned in your posts, people that aren't as successful financially wouldn't be able to continue and take their education to higher levels, and their seats would be taken over buy less educationally successful but more financially successful students.

    I personally believe and prefer a mixed economy, public schools should be available and provided by the government at the same time highly successful schools and universities such as Oxford, which demand a higher cost should be allowed to charge their students for the extra costs.

    However, there should be programs supported by governmental organizations that support students financially through funds, loans, and scholarship to help students continue their education and take it to the next level to avoid such problems like the one you have talked about.
  • jarofjuice
    Maysaloon -
    Yes, true, many things are not taught in school, it's all wisdom vs smartness vs intelligence.

    starwish -
    They should be shot :P

    za3tar -
    Thanks for your comment buddy.

    The reason, I think, that students are not enthusiastic about studying is because of the family mentality as well as those of the peers. But if the parents emphasized the important of education it might be a strong incentive to work harder.

    You're right, though, many things work hand in hand. All the aspects you talked about have to be "updated" simultaneously. Parents should be taught that their kid's worth is what he learns rather from the name of the school attended. The teachers must have some passion about the subjects as well as the class. If you ask any teacher, the enthusasim of teaching is almost directly proportional to that of the students' willingness to learn.

    I am not saying to have it all the way free. There are debates over that, but a school can offer one or two free courses for the general public. The same can be done by universities.

    It's really important that our schools and education systems be revamped because for the exorbitant amounts of money paid by the parents, the quality doesn't deliver.
  • Yes it is tragic that good education is limited to those with good wealth. It really bugs me the attitude we Arabs have that "Oh he graduated from abroad he must be smart. Oh he graduated from a local university he must be dumb" .. after all George Bush was a graduate of both Yale & Harvard.

    There is no denying that our education system in the Arab world has to be revamped. Unfortunately not many students are really passionate about science and education, and it is a big problem and our schools have a big role in it.

    I think going all the way and saying that all education should be free is a bit too idealistic and can't be sustained by most countries in today's world. But, what can be done is to give incentives to students to excel. Why not offer full scholarships to all students who excel in school ?

    Not only that, but let us not forget that in order to get students excited and have them learn well, you should make teachers excited and have them engaged in their fields. So funding research in universities and upgrading labs in schools should be a good idea.

    Anyway .. this clearly is a very important subject and if we were to ever develop we must fix this issue.
  • Yes, its the same everywhere. I hate it when people from Oxford/Cambridge are treated like Gods. Meh!
  • It's tragic but unfortunately the state of the world. One other point, which is that an educated person does not necessarily mean they are enlightened. There is a wisdom which schools cannot teach and many people confuse getting an education of any sort with being wise, which is not the case.
blog comments powered by Disqus